Court hearing updates.

The third hearing concluded yesterday; I await the attorney’s response, acknowledging the 18-hour time difference between Michigan and Bangladesh.  My disappointment stems from the case’s protracted nature despite the provision of complete evidence, suggesting a swift resolution should have been possible.  I understand that up to seven hearings may be necessary, incurring additional costs of $500 per hearing, plus the attorney’s $300 fee.  These expenses are financially burdensome, especially considering prior scam losses, although I remain confident of a favorable outcome with double restitution.  However, the multiple hearings seem excessive, particularly given the second hearing’s clear demonstration of deception and the suspects’ evident guilt;  expeditious resolution and restitution would have been preferable to mitigate ongoing financial strain.

Comments

Leave a comment